"A Christ that embraced abortion dogma would be far less compassionate. That love would be conditional, dependent upon someone’s assigned worth. Those deemed 'unwanted' or 'undesirable' would automatically be assumed to be unlovable. He would preach to the multitudes that they should treat others how they would like to be treated, unless the others were worthless and their removal improved your bottom line or cleared up your future schedule ... The woman caught and accused of adultery, would not have been spared from stoning because there were no men (including the adulterous ones) without sin, but because there was no sin to speak of. Christ the ProChoicer would’ve given her partially accurate birth control advice, STD-prone prophylactics and an affirming lecture on how her sexual promiscuity was normal and healthy. This is the time of year billions of people celebrate John 15:13, but a 'pro-choice' Jesus would've prevented such selflessness. Narcissism is at the heart of abortion doctrine ...  Instead we have a Messiah who cares about every human life from the moment of conception until natural death and beyond. He chose to be nailed to a cross, despite His innocence, and die so that we can be redeemed, no matter what we’ve done. We have a Savior who saves the most wretched, the most defenseless and the most broken. He emblazoned Purpose on our hearts from the moment we were conceived. In Christ we have compassion, grace, mercy, love, forgiveness, hope and possibility personified." (4/22/14)



"To be clear, a sperm cell is alive. An egg is alive. When they come together, the human being is alive. Those are simply the facts, and no one can argue otherwise. So, the abortion debate really becomes this: At what point in the development of a human being is it still ok to kill the child and not feel that it is morally wrong? Apparently, to some on the left, there is NO point at which it is morally wrong. As pointed out in an article last year in the Journal of Medical Ethics, the authors argue that it should be legal to murder the child AFTER birth, because the child does not 'possess a moral right to life.' The authors claim the newborn child is not actually a 'person' yet ... Getting back to Harris-Perry, according to her radical brand of death culture ideology, a parent can 'decide' that a baby born alive isn't really alive yet ... Harris-Perry went crazy during the George Zimmerman trial, proclaiming his guilt even as the jury said otherwise. Apparently it's wrong in her eyes to defend yourself against a vicious attack, but it's quite acceptable to kill a defenseless child even after the child has been born. It's just sick. And the real problem here is NOT [just] with people like Harris-Perry. It's with all the people in this country who simply don't pay attention to what's going on and fall for the left wing agenda promoted by the likes of Barack Obama and the media." (7/30/2013)



“President Obama would have us believe that there is some kind of war on women, just in time for his re-election effort. But he is the one who made sure that China’s monstrous population effort would be fully supported by the UN Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA). Two days after assuming power, President Obama revoked the Reagan-era Mexico City policy of the previous administration. He forces us to fund international Planned Parenthood. That means that the world-wide war on baby girls will go forward, with U.S. taxpayers footing part of the bill. President Obama says that attempts to cut off taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood are part of a campaign against women. Hundreds of millions of baby girls have been killed. Demographer Nick Eberstadt has carefully documented this ‘gendercide.’ This world-wide ‘war against baby girls’ is a major result of Planned Parenthood’s population control ideology and its aggressive marketing of abortion-on-demand. While Dr. Eberstadt demonstrates that this war on baby girls is having disastrous consequences now, it can have even more terrible implications in the future. We are looking at the collapse of whole nations … So next time you hear a liberal or a reporter going on about a ‘war on women,’ make sure to ask if this commentator favors legal protection of unborn baby girls. If they do, then we can take the rest of their comments seriously. If they say that’s a matter of ‘choice,’ remind them that millions of unborn baby girls never got to choose life.” (4/9/2012)



“And now, the advocates of death have stepped up the tempo. A new generation of ethicists has begun making the case in favor of so-called ‘after birth abortion.’ Like Princeton's Peter Singer, they believe that infants are not ‘persons’ entitled to the right to life ... and no claim to the protections of law. The question of whether a newborn child would be allowed to live or die, the ‘ethicists’ argue, would depend solely on the wishes of their parents. The same reasons that might 'justify' an abortion at three months gestation would justify an ‘after-birth abortion’ … This is our future: an infant's claim on life will be no greater than that of a pre-born child-non-existent. More precisely, this is our future unless we fight back-loudly … And we must speak up bluntly to unmask this ‘ethical’ proposal for what it is: pure evil. This evil of ‘after-birth abortion’ serves up the opportunity to open conversations with your friends and family who are advocates of a woman's 'right to choose.' Where does that 'right' logically end? Only at arbitrary junctures. What's the difference between a baby one hour before birth and one hour after … Who can remain silent in the face of such outrageous views, peddled as ethical decision-making? But make no mistake-remaining silent will bring defeat, because our silence in the face of such an abominable proposal cloaks it with respectability.” (3/15/12)



“Liberals love to frame the killing of developing humans as being about women’s lives, health, and rights. But, according to the Center for Disease Control, about 3% of abortions are performed for reasons of a woman’s health. Abortions that are performed because a woman’s life is in danger amount to a fraction of one percent. That leaves more that 96% for convenience with some 50% repeat customers. Regarding abortion, the liberal agenda is really about two things. One, an alleged right to sexual promiscuity and two, an alleged right to have others bear social and financial responsibility for that promiscuity. Fortunately, a sizeable part of the American population doesn’t see things this way. And, fortunately, a sizeable part of our population remains in awe of the miracle of life and our responsibilities toward all aspects of life, both in and outside of the womb. It doesn’t take that much thought to realize the fallacious thinking that suggests that matters of economy and matters of morality have nothing to do with each other. The ‘right to abortion’ culture is simply a subset of the entitlement culture, the culture that says your life is about making claims on others rather than personal responsibility. Disrespect for life and disrespect for property go hand in hand. We can’t divorce our sexual promiscuity from our fiscal promiscuity. Restoring personal responsibility in both areas is what we need today to get our nation back on track.” (10/24/11)



“As far as I'm concerned, there's a circle in Hell reserved for late-term abortionists. But this is the Obama era, so Hollywood makes TV shows casting them as heroic figures. Such is the state of our popular culture. On the May 12 episode of ABC's ‘Private Practice,’ Dr. Addison Montgomery (played by actress Kate Walsh, a real-life Planned Parenthood activist) spewed the strongest pro-abortion – ‘pro-choice’ -- rhetoric as she performed a partial-birth abortion … Of course, the doctor added those fiendish and violent pro-lifers are always ruining the Era of Choice. ‘It's still hard. And even after you make the most difficult and personal decision that there is, it's still not safe. Because you have some fanatic who claims to value life who can walk into an abortion clinic and blow it up.’ It's the ultimate Orwellian argument. We live in a country where 4,000 abortions are performed daily and it's the pro-lifers who are killers.’” (5/20/11)



“In an interview with an NBC affiliate in Richmond, VA, President Obama responded to the recent vote to defund Planned Parenthood after a flood of videos exposed illegal activities taking place at their clinics including exhibiting a willingness to support sex trafficking of minors, secret abortions for minors, and giving ‘pimp’ discounts. ‘I think sometimes these issues get manufactured,’ [Obama] said ‘they get a lot of attention in the blogosphere’ … It’s not particularly surprising that Obama would defend Planned Parenthood. Obama is arguably the most pro-abortion president in American History. As a state Senator in Illinois, he continually stalled legislation that would have prevented doctors from killing babies outside of the womb … he can’t help but reveal who he is as well as what his agenda will be ...” (2/21/11)



“Echoing the same kind of dark euphemisms plied by Planned Parenthood propagandists who refer to unborn life as ‘fetal and uterine material,’ Gosnell referred to his deadly trade as ‘ensuring fetal demise.’ Reminiscent of the word wizards who refer to the skull-crushing partial-birth abortion procedure as ‘intact dilation and evacuation’ and ‘intrauterine cranial decompression,’ Gosnell described his destruction of babies' spinal cords as ‘snipping.’ He rationalized his macabre habit of cutting off dead babies' feet and saving them in rows and rows of specimen jars as ‘research’ … Meanwhile, the death racketeers have launched a legislative and regulatory assault across the country on pro-life crisis pregnancy centers from New York City to Baltimore, Austin and Seattle that offer abortion alternatives, counseling and family services to mostly poor, vulnerable minority women … the grand jury itself pointed out that loosened oversight of abortion clinics enacted under pro-choice former GOP Gov. Tom Ridge enabled Gosnell's criminal enterprise -- and led to the heartless execution of hundreds of babies. Mass murder got a pass in the name of expanding ‘access’ and appeasing abortion lobbyists … Deadly indifference to protecting life isn't tangential to the abortion industry's existence -- it's at the core of it. The Philadelphia Horror is no anomaly. It's the logical, bloodcurdling consequence of an evil, eugenics-rooted enterprise wrapped in feminist clothing.” (1/20/11)



China has for more than thirty years been engaged in a ruthless campaign of forced abortions. Beijing’s one-child policy, were it to be enforced world wide, would lead not only to totalitarianism and massive human rights violations, it would lead to infanticide, as well … Doesn’t it seem strange that after thirty years of such inhumanity, China is still one of the world’s leading polluters? … Could Americans ever be forced under such an inhuman regime? Is this what Global Warming alarmism leads to?” (12/15/09)




“Abortion is not about a woman's "right to choose"; it is about a more fundamental "right to life," which is one of three specifically identified unalienable rights in the Declaration of Independence (and the Constitution, through Article VII and the Bill of Rights). And it is a violation of government's primary purpose: to protect innocent life.” (1/15/09) 



“On the three big issues of today — life, marriage, homosexual behavior — President-elect Obama has plans to turn far left and ignore the will of the people.” (11/21/08)



“Obama: WRONG Change for Children.” (Posted 9/23/08)

http://www.newsmax.com/hirsen/youtube_censors_/2008/09/22/133081.html (article/video)

http://www.operationrescue.org/archives/youtube-yanks-video-exposing-obama%E2%80%99s-abortion-extremism/ (article/video)


Abortion Stance Clear (8/21/08)

http://www.newsmax.com/limbaugh/obama_abortion_stance/2008/08/21/124052.HTML (article)


Obama and Live Born Abortion (8/26/08)

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_live_born_abortion/2008/08/26/124988.html?s=al&promo_code=6883-1 (article)


45 Million Killed

www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/3/12/230024.shtml?s=al&promo_code=2F33-1 (article)


Abortion Is Not a Right

http://www.humanevents.com/rightangle/index.php?p=21897 (article)


Tax Supported Abortion (Posted 6/4/08)

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MichelleMalkin/2008/06/04/planned_parenthoods_obscene_profits (article)


Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Affirmed

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=20320 (article)


High Court Bans Partial-Birth Abortion

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=20328 (article)


Unborn Babies (Posted 10/24/08)

http://townhall.com/blog/g/3194db10-b5c3-4c65-8f90-dc85bfc64380?comments=true&commentsSortDirection=Descending (article)


“All laws are based on morality; the only question is whose morality is being imposed. The pro-abortionist seeks to impose his values by law just as much as the anti-abortionist.” (Posted 12/13/07)

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=23911 (article)


Moral Inversion

The height of hypocrisy—the essence of evil: (4000 solders vs. 45 million babies)

Many of those who protest any war to protect freedom and democracy support the death of 45 million babies and call it pro-choice. Hopefully, most of us will never have to deal with the guilt and pain that comes from being brave enough to kill babies, but not terrorists.